ADVERTISEMENT

Facebook, good or bad?

TUMe

I.T.S. Legend
Dec 3, 2003
23,249
2,203
113
77

In the beginning Z created Facebook. It was mostly about friends keeping up with friends. Now two groups are against it: Liberals and Conservatives. It is weighed down with adds and censorship and frequent format changes. Both parties have pro and anti forces. Oh, and people who "like" that they were liked. There is an ever present bickering between parties and they claim that one or the other should be reigned in.
 
Them and Twitter are in a tough spot.

FB has known for fake news since 2013, 2014.
It amazes me that so many people won't believe any media outlet but believe any meme on FB that supports their cause.

Anyway, FB is trying to play catch up in this realm to save its self but with the current environment of Trump conspiracists, FB may be the way of MySpace.

Twitter is has always been pretty decent at limiting crap. It's just more visible now because the leader of the free world lies and loses his mind on their almost daily.
 
Them and Twitter are in a tough spot.

FB has known for fake news since 2013, 2014.
It amazes me that so many people won't believe any media outlet but believe any meme on FB that supports their cause.

Anyway, FB is trying to play catch up in this realm to save its self but with the current environment of Trump conspiracists, FB may be the way of MySpace.

Twitter is has always been pretty decent at limiting crap. It's just more visible now because the leader of the free world lies and loses his mind on their almost daily.
Yeah, the problem is Facebook has something like a billion users, and it is damn near impossible to police for abuses. And by abuses, I mean the regular run of the mill stuff. People making direct threats to others, uploaded pornography or even kiddie porn, copyright infringements, racist hate speech like going on someone's page and spamming with the "N" word, and other illegal forms of "speech". They do this literally by hand. Someone complains or flags something, and they have a team of people that review and delete things as necessary. A lot of high turnover in that job. People generally last 6 months and then go into therapy for PTSD. No joke. Humanity's worst is ugly.

So after they are done just doing all of that, they don't have a lot of human resources left to try and figure out if their platform is being abused by organized outsiders coordinating disinformation or if state actors are buying up propaganda adspace via shell corporations and the like. Even if they become aware, it's hard to figure out what to do about it. Those people by definition are harder to catch because they have resources and motives to cover their tracks, and they exist in a legal gray area. It's a monster they've created, and I don't know what the right answer is, honestly. I think the world would be better if FB and Twitter just went away, but that's not really a 'solution'.
 
From a societal and political standpoint, both are a problem. As long as social media uses algorithms to show you what it thinks you want to see, and those algorithms are damn good, they are a danger. It amplifies confirmation bias and thus leads to people continuing to believe what they want.

As someone who has spent over half his life working in IT, specifically web-focused, and have a decent understanding of how "trackers" work on the web, both companies know so much about you. Even if you don't have an account with either company if you've ever looked at a tweet (including those embedded in another webpage), viewed a public Facebook post, or even been on a webpage that has the little social facebook button/image. They know you and can track you.
 
Yeah, the problem is Facebook has something like a billion users, and it is damn near impossible to police for abuses. And by abuses, I mean the regular run of the mill stuff. People making direct threats to others, uploaded pornography or even kiddie porn, copyright infringements, racist hate speech like going on someone's page and spamming with the "N" word, and other illegal forms of "speech". They do this literally by hand. Someone complains or flags something, and they have a team of people that review and delete things as necessary. A lot of high turnover in that job. People generally last 6 months and then go into therapy for PTSD. No joke. Humanity's worst is ugly.

So after they are done just doing all of that, they don't have a lot of human resources left to try and figure out if their platform is being abused by organized outsiders coordinating disinformation or if state actors are buying up propaganda adspace via shell corporations and the like. Even if they become aware, it's hard to figure out what to do about it. Those people by definition are harder to catch because they have resources and motives to cover their tracks, and they exist in a legal gray area. It's a monster they've created, and I don't know what the right answer is, honestly. I think the world would be better if FB and Twitter just went away, but that's not really a 'solution'.
People have a voice...

That's sounds good on the surface.
 
I only use facebook to keep up with birthdays and to keep up with what's happening in my friends and relatives lives. I ignore the rest, left or right political quotes included.

I use twitter to selectively follow things like an 'engineering site', tu sports, etc. I have never tweeted anything.

They were good for their original purpose.
 
Just browsing the "news" article on yahoo, most are just someone's opinion; the kind of thing that used to be on a editorial page.
 
Facebooks original mission statement was as follows: “Facebook’s mission is to give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected.” They were able to gain the section 230 protections under this initial mission statement. They have lost their way. They are no longer a public forum (which is ok) but as you choose your method to communicate, evaluate it like a phone company provider. If it’s not meeting your needs, make the switch!
 
This is why I tend to just read the CNBC news site, financial news rarely outright lies.
 
Suspicious of the color of the sky. Probably switched to Parler pretty quickly. Likes echo chambers.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT