She has always been a hawk on climate change, so it could be genuine. But she didn't have anything to do with writing the Senate version (I think that was Markey?), so she may have just been showing off her environmental bona fides for a bill she knew wouldn't pass. She was running for president, after all.
I thought Biden was going to pick someone else and save her for the AG spot if elected, but he surprised me. I think she's a good choice from a purely political perspective. She's no cookie cutter Democrat, and it will be interesting to see what she does as VP if Biden wins.
Gmoney: I have not read the "Green New Deal" personally, and thus I have very little stake in it. I'm generally supportive of legislation aimed at curbing climate change, but I'm not so naive as to blindly support any old bill that has "environment" stamped all over it. So just out of curiosity, is there something specific in it that you don't like?