So basically some juice bar just paid BYU's 35 walk-ons the amount equivalent to their tuition, essentially putting them on scholarship. This will change things for a lot of schools and hurt TU if say an OU or OSU want to bring a kid in as a "walk-on" with arrangements to pay his tuition through a NIL deal thus effectively eliminating scholarship limits. The only saving grace is if a kid thinks he can play right away whereas at a P5 school there is a much smaller chance they play any meaningful plays at all.
BYU and NIL
- Thread starter TU_BLA
- Start date
Schools like TU will pick up a lot of players after their 2nd year in a bigger program. This is going to resemble what NEO was in the 60's when OU, KU, Arkie U, Missouri, Alabama and others used them as a place to put non-qualifiers for 2 years to get them eligible for entrance. TU picked up Ralph McGill when Bear Bryant at Alabama thought he had recruited over him. These kids transfer out with a major chip on their shoulder and are looking for a place to prove it.
College sports as we all knew it, is Dead. Done. Finished. Over.
Naw... its just going to shed the veil of amateurism that its been hiding behind... we all knew that the big schools were basically pro sports.. now that line can be finally drawn and kids that dont belong in college can go get paid to play for a local "NFP" semi pro university licenced and branded program..
player will go to the highest bidder. maybe they should enact a salary cap per team.
what happens when Nike pays a star player a million dollars and then he gets benched. how much pressure will nike the put on the coach to play the player.
what happens when Nike pays a star player a million dollars and then he gets benched. how much pressure will nike the put on the coach to play the player.
that’s the best question I’ve seen during this mess.
Thats why pressure will be put on the programs to only have 45 man rosters.. so that the talent will be spread out across the SuperLeague.
This seems like it changes things but it doesn’t. It’s just a publicity stunt. Schools have long ago endowed “academic” scholarships for athletes and so whether it’s a really tasty energy bar company or the sale of grandpa’s farm after he dies, schools have been doing this for awhile.
Second, there’s still just 22 players on the field and many P5s don’t use all 85 schollys for a variety of reasons. I saw the other day that KU has been at 70 scholarships at one point and is at like 78 right now. UAB used to travel with 47 scholarship players. Kids want to play. They might actually be more likely to go programs that aren’t funding more competition to get on the field.
Third, the real issue here isn’t scholarship limits but signing limits. It’s a way to get a guy on campus when you are at the 25 scholly limit for the year. So schools can now basically sign free transfers out of high school on a training contract. Take TU’s issue at CB. We could, in theory, bring in two scholarship CBs but now also bring in 5 or 6 or maybe more paid walk-ons to compete for the job too and if they don’t get a spot, they are free to move on if they don’t play. Kids will get lied to and exploited this way and be left with no place to go. It’s inevitable.
Fourth, it really just creates another layer in the pecking order. 1) Scholarship with NIL money, 2) NIL money but no scholarship but no out of pocket expense, 3) no scholarship no NIL but academic scholarship, 4) no scholarship no NIL, paying some or all out of pocket.
Fifth, the real issue is competitive balance because Utah law and tax laws permit it. In other states, it’s prohibited.
I hope this helps.
Second, there’s still just 22 players on the field and many P5s don’t use all 85 schollys for a variety of reasons. I saw the other day that KU has been at 70 scholarships at one point and is at like 78 right now. UAB used to travel with 47 scholarship players. Kids want to play. They might actually be more likely to go programs that aren’t funding more competition to get on the field.
Third, the real issue here isn’t scholarship limits but signing limits. It’s a way to get a guy on campus when you are at the 25 scholly limit for the year. So schools can now basically sign free transfers out of high school on a training contract. Take TU’s issue at CB. We could, in theory, bring in two scholarship CBs but now also bring in 5 or 6 or maybe more paid walk-ons to compete for the job too and if they don’t get a spot, they are free to move on if they don’t play. Kids will get lied to and exploited this way and be left with no place to go. It’s inevitable.
Fourth, it really just creates another layer in the pecking order. 1) Scholarship with NIL money, 2) NIL money but no scholarship but no out of pocket expense, 3) no scholarship no NIL but academic scholarship, 4) no scholarship no NIL, paying some or all out of pocket.
Fifth, the real issue is competitive balance because Utah law and tax laws permit it. In other states, it’s prohibited.
I hope this helps.
We just keep skewing the competitive balance to the Alabama’s and the Michigan’s of the world. Let’s just have 20 teams in the pro league and a relegation / promotion system and be done with it. Structure it like the Premier League and Championship.
Get rid of scholarships all together and have the kids be pro athletes who are dumb as rocks on someone else’s time. They can pay the university for the right to go there after they get injured or flame out. Half of them don’t have the combination of desire / ability to be legitimate students anyway.
Last edited:
