Game thoughts OSU
- By Stevene
- Hurricane Alley
- 74 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Most definitely, she must be plotting the demise of our whole system of government.She has a history of using "useful idiots" for personal gain.. what would be more Marxist than to use the means of a decadent capitalist system to incrementally erode its will and collapse it from within..
She has a history of using "useful idiots" for personal gain.. what would be more Marxist than to use the means of a decadent capitalist system to incrementally erode its will and collapse it from within..She's married to a lawyer who represents corporate clients such as Walmart and Merck. Hardly the behavior of a "card carrying Marxist".
Milan was firing on all cylinders today but it took them 4 games to get going and playing like they're expected to play. They have a huge UCL match tomorrow vs Liverpool in Milan. I'm a LFC fan but would like to see Pulisic play well in this one...and there's a really good chance he could thrive IF they play him at the 7. That would put him up against Trent Alexander Arnold, who is as poor of a 1v1 defender at the 5 as I've ever seen but his talent to trigger the offense from the spot is among the best in the world.Pulisic was good for AC Milan today. Actually, Busio was pretty good for Venezia despite them sucking.
See Lawpoke's response. Upper level GKs must be a 5th backline player to play through and relieve pressure in order to keep possession and help a team build out of the back. The best GKs can also see the vulnerabilities in the oppositions formation and figure out what they're trying to do so they can help their team defeat that. My son is actually excellent at that stuff. Had he been 6'1 instead of 5'11 and he's playing in college somewhere. The days of playing the pure shot stopper are done. If you can't play with the ball at your feet, you're not going very far.I don't know much about soccer but I read an article that said that the most important differentiator of great vs not great goalies is their ability to set up their team to score, not their ability to stop goals. I recall it argued there are limited shots on goal and the majority of variability on whether a shot goes in is beyond the control of the goalie regardless of skill, so great goalies only make a difference of a few goals a year from stopping skill. But effectively setting up the offense produces much more increase in goals, so even a middling stopping goalie who sets up the offense well produces a net goal benefit for their team relative to a great stopping goalie who doesn't set up the offense well. Thoughts? I have no ability to evaluate the argument but generally think more scoring in soccer would be better so I liked the thought.