ADVERTISEMENT

Missouri S&T Exhibition

I think that was AvsRick's point, which you objected to. I believe he was saying that we should treat every game as a "real" game, given our instability and disappointing results in recent years.
What? That was not even what the question was about. The team we are playing literally has this game marked as an exhibition on their schedule and yet it will count for us. Aston wanted to know how that is possible. How can one team not count a game and another could. To which I said I dont know that is weird. To which no one has yet to explain that either. and what exactly did I object to??

Youth soccer club

What would be the extent of a a "competitive" division there?
An academy/competitive set of teams like you would find at TSC and Blitz and competing in OPL. BASC has used the BA Express as a natural lure to keep kids from leaving their rec programs to go to the other clubs in town once those players felt they outgrew the rec level. My entire U9 team in BA left to move to different competitive clubs after that season. With Express, BA can now say stay here, play at those same competitive levels as those other clubs and pay a fraction of the cost in addition to playing at the best complex in OK. (It's still the best complex in the state although I suspect Scheel's will be on par or pass it in the next couple of years with the rapid improvements they are making). Both BASC and MTSC sort of were feeder programs into TSC prior to that and Barry somehow undid those relationships.

BA Express has been growing there base as well. And they've got a couple of pretty good teams. They aren't on the level to be playing ECNL, ECNL-RL, or even NPL yet but they aren't completely overmatched in their OPL games any more. Simba was trying to create the same thing at MTSC but they could never convince enough of the good players at Metro to make that extra monetary and time commitment for that level and they couldn't convince enough kids from other programs to come over either. I do know some TSc kids who did go over...but the problem eventually was having combined age group teams to make a team. I think my son's group there was combined 06/05/04 the first year so you have 16 year olds playing against U18/19 teams because you have 1 or 2 04s. Don't get me wrong, Simba is a great coach and soccer mind. He was just tasked with something that was unsustainable without a significant investment by MTSC into pushing or forcing certain teams and kids into that level.

Missouri S&T Exhibition

That teaches the coach nothing of his team. He went out and did that the first exhibition and won by what?? 40 24 . This one was to find weaknesses. Winning doesnt tell you where you are weak. Would you rather see a rough exhibition that he can go in and fix and not count against us? Or see something bad happen week 2 and we lose because we didnt find anything out in our exhibition and it could have been addressed weeks before?

Missouri S&T Exhibition

This seems obvious to me, and it's an idea that rightly or wrongly is well entrenched in sports culture, that when a lower team plays a higher team, the lower team is motivated to give it their all and the higher team might slack. You hear this a lot when a higher team talks about a lower team like "this was their super bowl" or the best team is like "every team brings their A game against us." I'd expect a bunch of DII kids to work like crazy to beat a DI team. And the coach probably looks at the value of the game for the DII team differently than the DI team. Maybe I'm not understanding your point because it seems obvious.
it's the opposite in this case. It will be an exhibition for them but a game for us.

Missouri S&T Exhibition

Funny that one team can consider it an exhibition in their schedule while the other teams doesn’t…

When is a friendly not a friendly?
This seems obvious to me, and it's an idea that rightly or wrongly is well entrenched in sports culture, that when a lower team plays a higher team, the lower team is motivated to give it their all and the higher team might slack. You hear this a lot when a higher team talks about a lower team like "this was their super bowl" or the best team is like "every team brings their A game against us." I'd expect a bunch of DII kids to work like crazy to beat a DI team. And the coach probably looks at the value of the game for the DII team differently than the DI team. Maybe I'm not understanding your point because it seems obvious.

Missouri S&T Exhibition

That teaches the coach nothing of his team. He went out and did that the first exhibition and won by what?? 40. This one was to find weaknesses. Winning doesnt tell you where you are weak. Would you rather see a rough exhibition that he can go in and fix and not count against us? Or see something bad happen week 2 and we lose because we didnt find anything out in our exhibition and it could have been addressed weeks before?
If this is his logic then we should be playing a real team that can stretch us. The fact that MOST and not Drake or Ill. St. stretched us is concerning.

Missouri S&T Exhibition

Exhibition games are literally designed as one last chance before a season starts to see where you are lacking. Where you need to practice more, get stronger, and what you can build upon. It's to get that 1-2 weeks of closed practices to really get prepared for opening game. A coach who uses exhibitions only to get a "W" is doing it wrong in my opinion. You don't learn anything from that. You need those games to find those weaknesses and improve upon them. Put them in rough scenarios and see how they do.
Well, usually coaches schedule exhibitions against lower division teams so they can do the things you said and still get the easy W. Most coaches don't have to choose one or the other. That's the concern. We should be able to play the end of the bench and win by 20.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT